Should I use Rust over C++?

Rust is a possible replacement for C++ for many applications , with use mostly being driven by Rust’s support for memory safety. Comparable to C++ in performance and platform support and controlled by an independent foundation, Rust is definitely a technology worth keeping an eye on.

Originally Answered: Is Rust easier than C++? Absolutely! Rust does have a steeper learning curve, in the sense that it’s more difficult for newcomers to get something up and running. However, everything from that point on is easier – Rust has less features than C++, and most importantly, less footguns and traps.

Essentially, to avoid the memory-safety vs. speed trade-off, C++ leaves memory safety to the developer, whereas Rust has inherent memory safety bounds that can be lifted with `unsafe` code. The Rust model for memory safety is a clear reason for selecting Rust, in case you feel memory safety is your problem in C++ .13 Eyl 2021