Should I learn Rust or python?

Rust is faster and can be more than twice as fast as Python . Since Rust is compiled directly into machine code, there is no interpreter or virtual machine between the code and the hardware. Another factor that improves the performance of Rust is its memory management.

Here’s the big hint – go with Rustlang . Sure, C++ has the lion’s share of community support, and huge libraries, but Rust language is so much better in nearly every other way. Rust teaches you to code properly, and the tough love as a beginner is definitely appreciated by those further on in their careers.

You definitely don’t need to learn Rust. It’s a neat language though and it’s worth tooling around in for a bit, at very least to get a feel for the ‘borrow checker’ . If you are in a field where everything is being rewritten in Rust, then it may be a good idea to spend some time on it.

Rust will teach you many things about systems programming, and is generally a well-made language . You will certainly program differently after learning either language, even when not using it.

Yes, 100% learning C++ is worthwhile , and it would be in the foreseen future. It doesn’t look like Rust gonna replace C++ anytime soon, if at all. It certainly might replace C at some point (next 10 years or so).

It has the strong support of generics with Guaranteed Safety and its complexity of code makes it quite beneficial. It has rich patterns and syntax and supports easy Integration of C and several languages with no cost abstraction.

Rust: low-level language with abstractions from higher-level languages. The low-level language Rust is so efficient that it can do without automatic garbage collection . Nevertheless, it offers the performance of C and C++, but without the pitfalls that developers have to know and consider at work.