Rust vs Go

No. A language may replace another in certain use cases, but it won’t be able to make it obsolete . To make a language obsolete, you must do the hardest thing: killing its community and implementation maintainers.

No. A language may replace another in certain use cases, but it won’t be able to make it obsolete . To make a language obsolete, you must do the hardest thing: killing its community and implementation maintainers.

Go’s rich standard library and easy concurrency makes standing up HTTP servers or other networked services simple and easy . Go is also faster, safer, and less memory intensive than most of the legacy competition. For example, Go is less memory intensive than Java and C#, faster than Python and Ruby, safer than C++.

Go’s rich standard library and easy concurrency makes standing up HTTP servers or other networked services simple and easy . Go is also faster, safer, and less memory intensive than most of the legacy competition. For example, Go is less memory intensive than Java and C#, faster than Python and Ruby, safer than C++.

Rust, Go is more popular than Rust . Now that you’ve seen Golang vs. Rust side by side, here’s a more in-depth look at Rust and Golang.