As far as speed/performance, Rust is on the same page as C++ . There are situations where it is easier to write faster programs in C++ because it’s easy to ignore fundamental problems in the programs. From this small sample size, it’s clear that both are fast. … Both Rust and C++ are fast.
Read moreShould I use Rust over C++?
Essentially, to avoid the memory-safety vs. speed trade-off, C++ leaves memory safety to the developer, whereas Rust has inherent memory safety bounds that can be lifted with `unsafe` code. The Rust model for memory safety is a clear reason for selecting Rust, in case you feel memory safety is your problem in C++ .13 Eyl 2021
Read moreWill C++ be replaced by Rust?
Rust is a possible replacement for C++ for many applications , with use mostly being driven by Rust’s support for memory safety. Comparable to C++ in performance and platform support and controlled by an independent foundation, Rust is definitely a technology worth keeping an eye on.
Read moreIs C++ harder than Rust?
Originally Answered: Is Rust easier than C++? Absolutely! Rust does have a steeper learning curve, in the sense that it’s more difficult for newcomers to get something up and running. However, everything from that point on is easier – Rust has less features than C++, and most importantly, less footguns and traps.
Read more