Is Lua better than C++?

Although the Lua compiler is quite efficient when compared with compilers for other languages, compilation is a heavy task . So, you should avoid compiling code in your program (e.g., function loadstring) whenever possible.

The only “real” advantages of Lua over C++ is that you don’t have to compile it , and there are a lot of premade Lua interpreters that you can integrate really easily. Sure, you could use C++, but then you’ve either gotta interpret it, or dynamically link files to your code to use it, and that’s just a pain.

Lua is fast To claim to be “as fast as Lua” is an aspiration of other scripting languages. Several benchmarks show Lua as the fastest language in the realm of interpreted scripting languages . Lua is fast not only in fine-tuned benchmark programs, but in real life too.26 Oca 2022

Lua has an extremely clean simple design and a small API. I think this is the reason that it has the world’s fastest JIT implementation for a dynamic scripting language. Lua is extremely popular within the gaming market because of its speed (see also speed compared to python).

Against Lua, Python is slow in speed . It is faster in speed in comparison to Python. 07. It is usually used for scripting application and also a stand-alone program.

The Lua is based on a multi-paradigm but primarily focus on the scripting language. … The Lua is better for game development but python does not provide good support for mobile games and applications. Lua is easier than the Python language but Python is popular and demanding language than the Lua language for beginners.

Horrible design models and interpreter-based languages have never really been good and or liked. Its limited uses and functionally really hinders the language from being useful outside .